2010-399
Created By: Latisha Thomas on 07/21/2011 at 02:46 PM
Category: Ethics Rulings
Caption:

LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS

DATE: OPINION NO: 2010-399

RE: In the matter of New Orleans Public Library Foundation

The Louisiana Board of Ethics (the “Board”) pursuant to the authority contained in LSA-R.S. 42:1141, conducted a private investigation concerning information received in a joint, self-reporting letter from the respondent, New Orleans Public Library Foundation, and Rica Trigs which indicated that the New Orleans Public Library Foundation (Foundation), may have violated Section 1117 of the Code of Governmental Ethics (LSA-R.S. 42:111C(2)(d)) (the “Code”) in connection with the New Orleans Public Library Foundation (Foundation) paying Ms. Trigs compensation when Ms. Trigs was prohibited from receipt of the compensation by the Code of Ethics. On the basis of information obtained by the Board during the course of the investigation, and with the concurrence of the Foundation, the Board now makes the following essential:

I.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
The New Orleans Public Library (Library) was created by ordinance as a stand -alone entity that is part of city government, but has its own governing board.
2.
The Foundation is a private, non - profit corporation organized for the purpose of receiving donations, property or monies generated through private fund-raising efforts for the benefit of the Library. The Foundation also acts as a conduit for grants whose proceeds are issued to the Foundation to support the Library system. The Foundation’s operations and activities are not regulated by the Library.
3.
The Foundation is governed by a board of trustees composed of the members of the Library Board of Directors, several community leaders, and the Library Director ex officio. Rica Trigs has never been a board member for the Foundation or the Library.
4.
Rica Trigs began her employed with the Library in January, 1998.
5.
At its March, 2008 meeting, the Library Board approved Rica Trigs as the Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the Library. Immediately after approval, the Library Board contacted the Chief Administrative Officer's (CAO) office for approval of the title change and pay raise. The CAO was concerned that some of the COO's duties were traditionally duties assigned to the Library Director per the City Charter so the pay increase was not approved immediately.
6.
The Library Board voted to request that the Foundation supplement Ms. Trigs' salary while her pay increase was pending with the City.
7.
At the Library Board’s June 2008 meeting, Rica Trigs signed a document titled “Clearly Defined Areas of Responsibility”. By signing the document Ms. Rigs acknowledged her duties and responsibilities as the COO of the Library. The responsibilities listed in the document did not include duties with the Foundation.
8.
Ms. Trigs performed services for the Foundation that were separate and distinct from her duties as COO of the Library. These duties included communicating with Foundation's attorneys on legal matters, special event planning, managing marketing materials and merchandise, general office work when Foundation employees were not available and providing general direction to the Foundation.
9.
In September 2009, Ms Trigs salary was approved by the CAO. Ms. Trigs discontinued her work with the Foundation and the Foundation hired an executive director. Ms. Trigs served as COO of the Library from March, 2008 until February, 4, 2011.
10.
Ms. Trigs received $60,219.60 for work performed for the Foundation between June, 2008 and September, 2009. As COO for the Library, Ms. Trigs received $131,138.00 for the period of June, 2008 until September, 2009.
II.
APPLICABLE LAW
At issue in this case is Section 1111C(2)(d) and Section 1117 of the Code of Governmental Ethics. Section 1111C(2)(d) of the Code prohibits a public servant from accepting anything of economic value from a person who has a business, contractual, or financial relationship with the agency of the public servant. Section 1117 of the Code prohibits a person from paying a public servant any thing of economic value when the public servant would be prohibited from receipt of the thing by the Code of Ethics.
Sections 1111C(2)(d) provides in pertinent part:
1111. Payment from nonpublic sources
C.(2) No public servant and no legal entity in which the public servant exercises control or owns an interest in excess of twenty-five percent, shall receive any thing of economic value for or in consideration of services rendered, or to be rendered, to or for any person during his public service unless such services are 1115. Gifts
A. No public servant shall solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any thing of economic value as a gift or gratuity from any person or from any officer, director, agent, or employee of such person, if such public servant knows or reasonably should know that such person: B. No public servant shall solicit or accept, directly or indirectly, any thing of economic value as a gift or gratuity from any person or from any officer, director, agent, or employee of such person, if such public servant knows or reasonably should know that such person:
(1) Conducts operations or activities which are regulated by the public servant’s agency.
1117. Illegal Payments 1102. Definitions
(16) “Person” means an individual or legal entity other than a governmental entity or an agency thereof.
III.
OPINION
It is the opinion of the Board that the Foundation violated Section 1117 of the Code of Ethics. Section 1117 of the Code prohibits a person from paying , directly or indirectly, to any public servant any thing of economic value where the public servant is prohibited from receipt of the thing by the Code of Ethics. Section 1102 defines a person as an individual or legal entity other than a governmental entity or an agency thereof.
Rica Trigs as the COO of the Library is a public servant. The Foundation as a private non-profit organization is a person. The Library and the Foundation have a business relationship whereby the Foundation receives donations, property and monies generated through private fund-raising efforts for the benefit of the Library. As such, Ms. Trigs is prohibited from accepting anything of economic value from the Foundation while the business relationship exist between the Library and the Foundation. While serving as COO of the Library and in violation of Section 1111C(2)(d) of the Code, Ms. Trigs received more than $60,000 from the Foundation for services rendered to the Foundation. As such, the Foundation was in violation of Section 1117 of the Code by paying Ms. Trigs when she was prohibited under Section 1111C(2)(d) from receipt of the payments.
For a violation of the Code of Governmental Ethics, the Louisiana Board of Ethics is authorized by statute to remove, suspend, order a reduction in pay, or demotion of the public employee, or impose a fine of not more than $10,000 or both. In this particular situation, given the facts outlined above, it is the conclusion of the Board that the interest of the public would be served by the imposition of a $3000.00 fine.
IV.
DECREE AND ORDER
For the foregoing reasons:
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED the Board finds as a matter of fact and as a conclusion of law that the New Orleans Public Library Foundation, violated Section 1117 of the Code of Governmental Ethics by paying Ms. Trigs compensation when Ms. Trigs was prohibited by the Code of Ethics from receipt of the payments.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that a fine of $3000.00, payable to the Treasurer of the State of Louisiana be and is hereby imposed upon the New Orleans Public Library Foundation for violating the Louisiana Code of Governmental Ethics.













By Order of the Board this 15th day of July , 2011.

s/Frank P. Simoneaux s/Blake Monrose
Frank P. Simoneaux, Chairman Blake Monrose, Vice Chairman

s/Terry Backhus s/Julie E. Blewer
Terry D. Backhus Julie E. Blewer



s/Reverend Gail E. Bowman s/Gary G. Hymel
Reverend Gail Bowman Gary G. Hymel


s/Jean M. Ingrassia s/Dr. Cedric W. Lowrey
Jean M. Ingrassia Dr. Cedric W. Lowrey



s/Dr. Louis Leggio Absent and did not participate.
Dr. Louis W. Leggio Scott D. Schneider



s/David Grove Stafford, Jr.
David Grove Stafford, Jr.

CONSENT
The undersigned (a) stipulates to the facts found by the Board; (b) waives the procedural requirements contained in Section 1141 of the Code; admits that its conduct, as described above, violated Section 1.11.7 of the Louisiana Code of Governmental Ethics; (d) consents to the publication of this opinion; (e) agrees to comply with the conditions and orders set forth in this opinion; and, (1) agrees not to seek judicial review of the findings and actions taken in this opinion.

s/New Orleans Public Library Foundation
New Orleans Public Library Foundation

5/20/11
Date
...........................